• We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. Read more here

UK Lockdown

ramone

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
7,279
Location
If i had to agree with you we would both be wrong
I think it approximates how our government was handling this until a fortnight ago when it lost its nerve with public pressure to follow what most the world is doing. Lots on the internet such as this:


Reading through the list of countries who would have had a very small amount of cases v the amount of people who have died in those countries makes interesting reading.
 

OmanGrecian

Active member
Joined
May 13, 2004
Messages
3,838
Location
Muscat, Oman
Some positive news from Italy, well I say positive, but people are still dying. The daily death rate is the lowest it has been in 2 weeks and has dropped for the past 3 days. There has also been a drop in the number of people in hospital.

The lockdown is starting to show why it was needed.
 

RedPaul

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Apr 23, 2004
Messages
5,298
Location
Woking
Thanks Oman. The whole world is hoping for some 'good' news from Italy, given you can't trust anything official coming out of China.
Is it still concentrated in the North - have Rome and the South slightly escaped thus far?
 

OmanGrecian

Active member
Joined
May 13, 2004
Messages
3,838
Location
Muscat, Oman
Thanks Oman. The whole world is hoping for some 'good' news from Italy, given you can't trust anything official coming out of China.
Is it still concentrated in the North - have Rome and the South slightly escaped thus far?

So far, yes. There have been daily cases down here, but nothing like what was seen in the North. There were concerns that this would spread South quite dramatically, but this is yet to be seen. The main concern down here is the high tensions building and people raiding stores. The South is relatively poor and people are running out of money and food.
 

RedPaul

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Apr 23, 2004
Messages
5,298
Location
Woking
Thanks. I guess the cash dominated economy the South must make this even more difficult.
Hopefully they will be able to end the extreme lockdown soon.
 

DB9

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jun 19, 2005
Messages
24,699
Location
Hampshire. Heart's in N Devon
Some positive news from Italy, well I say positive, but people are still dying. The daily death rate is the lowest it has been in 2 weeks and has dropped for the past 3 days. There has also been a drop in the number of people in hospital.

The lockdown is starting to show why it was needed.
And according to reports a 104 year old Italian woman has survived Covid-19, Good news but shows this virus is very unpredictable
 

IndoMike

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
May 9, 2010
Messages
34,044
Location
Touring Central Java...
This might be a daft question, but the virus doesn't disappear.during the lockdown : it just doesn't have anyone to infect, right?
So when we all crawl out from under the bed, we can be infected by the surviving virus carriers of the first wave, right? Or does the virus have a specific lifespan within a body and then die?
In effect the lockdown, will have to continue until a vaccine is found, no?
 

Legohead

Banned
Joined
Jan 28, 2016
Messages
6,762
We thank you for staying in.
Not quite what I meant but I understand some will misinterpret.
 

Spoonz Red E

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Apr 21, 2004
Messages
12,381
Location
Comfortably mid-table
This might be a daft question, but the virus doesn't disappear.during the lockdown : it just doesn't have anyone to infect, right?
So when we all crawl out from under the bed, we can be infected by the surviving virus carriers of the first wave, right? Or does the virus have a specific lifespan within a body and then die?
In effect the lockdown, will have to continue until a vaccine is found, no?
My understanding is:
Bearing in mind that some people can have the virus without symptoms.
If you had the virus while on lockdown and survived then it should have run its course and you may hopefully be immune.
If you didn't have it while on lockdown you are still succeptible to infection when restrictions are lifted.
That's where the antigen test will come into its own to get some solid data.

The current data suggests that for herd immunity, 2 thirds of the population will need to be infected to develop the antibodies before an uncontrolled mixing of the population does not mean a rise in cases. The best chance to do this quickly is with a vaccine but it can also be managed longterm with controlled exposure.

The main purpose of lockdown was to 'squash the curve' and not overwhelm the NHS.
Testing could help identify 'hotspots' and immunity so there could be zonal/filtered lockdowns and immunity passporting down the road.

The other factor is if there are advances in the treatment of the disease ICU patient levels can come down.
That could take pressure off the NHS even if the case numbers remain high.

Testing is the key and it's a shame we've lagged behind on this.
 
Last edited:

geoffwp

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
12,349
Location
Zen city
I think it approximates how our government was handling this until a fortnight ago when it lost its nerve with public pressure to follow what most the world is doing. Lots on the internet such as this:


I wonder how much of a factor population density is in terms of the virus spreading. Sweden's density is just over 57 per as mile while uk is over a thousand.
 
Top