IndoMike
Very well known Exeweb poster
Certainly a big difference between 40k, 1m and 4m : the figures bandied about on Exeweb40k being spent on the pitch at the end of the season.
Last edited:
Certainly a big difference between 40k, 1m and 4m : the figures bandied about on Exeweb40k being spent on the pitch at the end of the season.
That's because those figures are for different amounts of work. I never said we were spending £1m (not that you've suggested i did), i just gave details of what that £1m could get us as the club have explored various possibilities and their associated costs.Certainly a big difference between 40k, 1m and 4m : the figures bandied about on Exeweb
You're right : I wasn't suggesting you did. All info emanates from the club anyway, so I was contemplating which option they would take. If they've decided to take the 40k option, does that mean just relaying the pitch itself?That's because those figures are for different amounts of work. I never said we were spending £1m (not that you've suggested i did), i just gave details of what that £1m could get us as the club have explored various possibilities and their associated costs.
I know this is a made up example Lionel; the installation of the undersoil heating was the giveaway. Seriously though, are we to take it that the undersoil drainage system that it feels like it was installed a couple of years ago - is knackered? I can understand to a reasonable extent why the pitch is somewhat buggered, but I dont see a pitch thats as bad as ours on our away travels. In any event, are we to take it that the pitch drainage isnt any good anymore?The figure of £1m is to completely strip out the current pitch, dig down some distance, replace drainage, put in undersoil heating then build the ground back up and have one of those fancy fibre stitched (i don't know the proper name) pitches. Doing this would also mean having to improve the irrigation system and get new, lighter mowers. The work would also take about 3 months in total (including time to allow the pitch to settle and grow in) so would need to start as soon as the season finished.
There is surely some responsibility to be shared out....Either the work needed was wrongly evaluated, or if it was evaluated correctly, then the implementation was poor.All people are doing is pointing out the costs of various levels of work.
It would appear the club has for whatever reason postponed major pitch works this summer.
However, that does not mean the previous work was shoddy, just given the level of precipitation this year it has not coped well. Perhaps if funds and /or time become available, a higher level of investment will result in a pitch more able to deal with the weather resulting in a more consistent playing surface for the team.
You can't blame the contractors or club on this. They spent what they could in the hope it would be enough but it appears it wasn't.
Let's move on and I personally think any windfall from Ampadu would be well invested partly in a higher level of pitch.
Or it has deteriorated in the 7 years and 9 months since the new pitch was created.There is surely some responsibility to be shared out....Either the work needed was wrongly evaluated, or if it was evaluated correctly, then the implementation was poor.
But wasn't it pulled up and reworked a couple of years later?Or it has deteriorated in the 7 years and 9 months since the new pitch was created.
Wasn't a settlement reached with the company that did the pitch? I had understood legal advice had been taken.Or it has deteriorated in the 7 years and 9 months since the new pitch was created.