NEW Debate (!) - Online "Hate" Crimes

[Terryhall]

It's being treated as neither. The police are still desperately searching for something which they can charge them under - The police aren't as intelligent as our Terry unfortunately, so haven't realised there is sufficient grounds to charge them under the public order act.

They arrested them for public order offences. Please read post #5.

 

[ExeterCityLad]

They arrested them for public order offences. Please read post #5.

I've got to the bottom of this now. You don't understand the difference and procedure in arresting, charging and prosecuting. Nailed it.

 

[Hermann]

I've got to the bottom of this now. You don't understand the difference and procedure in arresting, charging and prosecuting. Nailed it.

They haven't charged because they're still investigating.

 

[Terryhall]

I've got to the bottom of this now. You don't understand the difference and procedure in arresting, charging and prosecuting. Nailed it.

This from the man who earlier refused to accept that my post with the word "arrested" was not the same as his post with the word "prosecuted".

 

[ExeterCityLad]

They haven't charged because they're still investigating.

They haven't charged because there is nothing to charge them of.

 

[Hermann]

They haven't charged because there is nothing to charge them of.

Well they won't know that until they've investigated.

 

[spanky]

I've got to the bottom of this now. You don't understand the difference and procedure in arresting, charging and prosecuting. Nailed it.

Well you should, that's for sure.

 

[spanky]

Fair enough if you haven't. I apologise. In which case Spanky was going off on a wild one and decided to decide you were offended, on your behalf.

Wrong again, Troll.