Incontinentia
Member
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2008
- Messages
- 877
I see your point, but the truth is that the crowd won't be anywhere near that if it's away from Wembley. I don't really see it myself, but the truth is that quite a few people go along because it's the "home of football" or something, but wouldn't go elsewhere.I really don't know. What I mean is that if the crowd could be as many as 20k (for example : and that's a stretch) then a smaller ground might provide a better atmosphere But each fan will have his own opinion I have no idea how many City fans would go to the final if at Wembley.
To give an example from rugby, they moved the Anglo-Welsh Cup away from Twickenham from 2009-10. Crowds went from about 50k to about 10k. It was always a second tier event at best and, once the allure of the big stadium experience had gone, there wasn't much of a market. Now it's true that the gulf in quality of stadium between Twickenham and Kingsholm or the Stoop is bigger than that between Wembley and Craven Cottage or Stamford Bridge (say). But you'd be lucky to get close to half the crowd if you moved it.