Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 44

Thread: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

  1. #11
    ramone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    If i had to agree with you we would both be wrong !
    Posts
    2,692

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews...Q&ocid=UE07DHP

    10 Years for the London met to come up with a burglary gone wrong !

    The very best dog handler in the world being told the blood on the wall may have been mosquitoes flying into it and the smell in the car was from a dirty nappy and not a dead body.
    To the jemmied / un jemmied shutters that were either open or closed on the night she vanished this case really winds me up.

    Interview the parents with non pre arranged (McCann) questions.

  2. #12
    elginCity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Going into Battle
    Posts
    7,532

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    I do have some sympathy with your view, Ramone.

    Watched the interview given by the high ranking Met Assistant Commissioner Rowley yesterday and his references to "Kate and Gerry" started to irk, it's all too cosy.

  3. #13
    Antony Moxey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Exmuff
    Posts
    38,380

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    I wonder what the police and public's reactions would be had the McCanns been from the lower orders rather than a nice middle class suburban area with a lifestyle to match?

  4. #14
    ramone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    If i had to agree with you we would both be wrong !
    Posts
    2,692

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Quote Originally Posted by Antony Moxey View Post
    I wonder what the police and public's reactions would be had the McCanns been from the lower orders rather than a nice middle class suburban area with a lifestyle to match?
    Probably similar to the Shannon Matthews incident where some officers involved used their old fashioned instincts to figure out where the truth actually laid.

    The other thing that winds me up about this case top people in MI5 getting involved within 3 days !

  5. #15

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Quote Originally Posted by Antony Moxey View Post
    I wonder what the police and public's reactions would be had the McCanns been from the lower orders rather than a nice middle class suburban area with a lifestyle to match?
    The working-class family would have taken the brats out to dinner with them, rather than thinking that their candlelit tapas 'me time' was more important than their kids' safety.

  6. #16
    ramone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    If i had to agree with you we would both be wrong !
    Posts
    2,692

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Wow another significant lead in this case

    http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews...Q&ocid=UE07DHP

    Just wondering what's next ?? Aliens , Time travellers or like a scene from the Knowing film !!

  7. #17

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Quote Originally Posted by ramone View Post
    Wow another significant lead in this case

    http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews...Q&ocid=UE07DHP

    Just wondering what's next ?? Aliens , Time travellers or like a scene from the Knowing film !!
    You just could not make this rubbish up,do they really think the public are fools? The little girl isn't likely to appear anytime soon,so why don't they just let it go.if they were responsible why don't they just say so or are they covering for someone higher up ?

  8. #18
    ramone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    If i had to agree with you we would both be wrong !
    Posts
    2,692

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Quote Originally Posted by dontpassback View Post
    You just could not make this rubbish up,do they really think the public are fools? The little girl isn't likely to appear anytime soon,so why don't they just let it go.if they were responsible why don't they just say so or are they covering for someone higher up ?
    I could solve the mystery I reckon in about 20 minutes !

    Give me Gerry McCann a pair of molegrip pliers and some sarsons malt vinegar in a locked room and hey presto the truth will be forthcoming.

    I'll save the public millions for about 18.37 (there's a sale on at toolstation at the moment).

  9. #19
    Alistair20000's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Quite Remarkable
    Posts
    20,106

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Is there actually any evidence that the McCanns did anything more serious than leaving their children unattended ?

  10. #20
    ramone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    If i had to agree with you we would both be wrong !
    Posts
    2,692

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Quote Originally Posted by Alistair20000 View Post
    Is there actually any evidence that the McCanns did anything more serious than leaving their children unattended ?
    2 x Cadaver dogs smelling the presence of dead remains and blood (which was apparently mosquitoes committing suicide into a wall)
    THE top FBI criminal profiler saying they are both hiding evidence. (they told him he was mistaken/ possibly telling lies)
    The presence of blood in a car they hired 3 weeks after she vanished.
    47 Unanswered questions (apart from "no comment")

    There is overwhelming circumstantial evidence in this case that has not been allowed to be followed up on by the McCanns and their PR people.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •