Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 44

Thread: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

  1. #1
    ramone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    If i had to agree with you we would both be wrong !
    Posts
    2,834

    Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Is it right that yet more money from the public funds is going in to look for 1 child who could possibly already be dead ?

    The total being 11.1 million when it seems that other children have gone missing and nowhere near this amount has been spent.

    Yes there may be a faint glimmer that the child may be found alive but think its gone too far now and the parents should be interviewed by someone like Paxman or even that Kyle bloke to answer key questions from that night.

    Having watched a criminal profiler offer his own take on an interview the McCanns gave some time ago he believes in that interview alone they know more than they have been willing to say publicly.

    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...D4&FORM=VRDGAR

    Its a bit long but well worth watching for his professional input.

  2. #2

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Unfortunately I think the little girl is dead,the cadaver dogs found traces of it and the whole demeanour of the mcanns doesn't seem right.if you speak to most females,the last thing they would have done with maddies cuddly toy would have been to wash it .i think the Portuguese dectective isn't far wrong with his analysis and I can only summise that mr and mrs McCann must have something very powerful on someone very high up to keep getting the financial and government assistance that they have had from day one.one day the truth will out but it will be a long time coming I think.

  3. #3
    ramone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    If i had to agree with you we would both be wrong !
    Posts
    2,834

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Ben Needhams mother had to return to work to help pay a private investigator to look for her child.

    What's the difference ?.

    Being friends with the Camerons and a private audience with the Pope may help !

  4. #4

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Quote Originally Posted by ramone View Post
    What's the difference ?.

    Being friends with the Camerons and a private audience with the Pope may help !
    In fairness this was after the incident in question

  5. #5
    ramone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    If i had to agree with you we would both be wrong !
    Posts
    2,834

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Quote Originally Posted by angelic upstart View Post
    In fairness this was after the incident in question
    But these sort of things have kept the McCann case high profile.

    My thing is why does this case deserve more public funds than the other

  6. #6

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Quote Originally Posted by ramone View Post
    Ben Needhams mother had to return to work to help pay a private investigator to look for her child.
    Do the McCanns not work then?

  7. #7
    ramone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    If i had to agree with you we would both be wrong !
    Posts
    2,834

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Quote Originally Posted by Sidey's back View Post
    Do the McCanns not work then?
    Not since the little girl went missing.

    And having had donated money by the public pay off their mortgage and pay for an extension to their house they don't really need to.

  8. #8

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Quote Originally Posted by ramone View Post
    Not since the little girl went missing.

    And having had donated money by the public pay off their mortgage and pay for an extension to their house they don't really need to.
    Are these facts or Daily Mail fake news?

    I feel incredibly sorry for the McCanns. It must be a torturous existence for them. And then to be constantly publicly vilified must be awful.

    Sadly it's looking like they'll never find the truth.

  9. #9
    ramone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    If i had to agree with you we would both be wrong !
    Posts
    2,834

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    This was reported by their own lawyer that monies had been used to pay off the remaining mortgage and fund the extra room to the house from the Find Maddie fund.

    Until such time as the both of them are investigated fully by British Police for not only negligence in leaving underage children alone and answer the numerous questions posed to them with full answers instead of the "no comment" replies im in the mindset that they certainly know more than they let on.

    Answer this ... why is it every time the funding is looking at being stopped there is extra funding found from out of thin air ?

    According to these parents...
    Cadaver dogs were wrong in 4 different areas one of which they didn't have access to until some 3 weeks afterwards.
    The locked shutters were opened with a pry bar, which was found to be untrue. Changed their story soon afterwards.
    David Payne making lewd gestures and comments to the father about the missing child. which was denied at first until evidence was shown it to be true.

    And so on .... sorry but there are far too many unanswered questions from not only these negligent parents but the rest of the people they were eating with that need to be sorted before anymore funding from the public purse.

  10. #10

    Re: Another 85,000 to fund "operational costs"

    Neglect,deceit,and suspicion of peadophilia are things that cannot be ignored in this case.if Maddie is dead,then she is better off out of it.as an aside there are also a lot of exeter connections with the various people involved.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •