Search results

That aged well 😄.

Maybe a Scottish side with GC connections touring the SW? 🤔

Goal of the season that

Ok, thanks. Time will tell of course, but history tells us that wherever Sky stick their oar in, fans who want to actually go to games are shafted.

Based on what?

NOW close the thread! 🤣

Or The Allardyce Principle as it is known. If you assess that your players are not bright enough or skilled enough to do what they’ve been asked, resort to a glorified form of kick and rush.

Surely it’s more ‘effective’ than having *less* possession and not scoring a goal? Is effectiveness only about results? Is possession an end in itself? Why are lions? 😄

Two very nice pubs actually - one at either end of the building

Huddersfield, to an open minded and curious chap like yourself, is full of interest 😄

Great goal, well worked

Cheltenham look shocking in defence, as fb says we need to take our chances

BBC Sport is always miles behind. LS is the quickest

Surprised you can afford it on your pension *runs and hides* 😄

I hope that’s a joke? Anyone who fought in WW2 would be at least 95 now. Financially as jw says it makes no sense to offer discounts to OAPs any more.

If you buy an iFollow pass for an ECFC away match, my understanding is that the home club keep the cash. Which is AH’s issue. (But maybe I am very confused)

Ah, ok, sorry, I misjudged your tone

This feels like a weirdly negative take. As we know, our model depends on transfer income, and as Rosencrantz says, if we for whatever reason didn’t make these sales we would cut our cloth accordingly. And you say yourself that the next financial year will already show transfer income a million...

These accounts look pretty good. 95% of clubs would kill for figures like these - we are solvent, profitable and sustainable. And kudos to the club for publishing the full accounts - have we done this before??

Will you look at that pitch!! Incredible