• We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies from this website. Read more here

Politics Today

Anonymous

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Messages
6,019
Location
in yr internats
Maybe now the lazy unemployed council house dwellers will be able to get a job in Starbucks. Just a shame they wont be able to afford to buy any fruit or veg in the supermarket.
 

tavyred

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 23, 2004
Messages
14,159
It is remarkable how many left leaning ‘commentators’ on here are prepared to see it from the business standpoint on immigration and see a situation where wages are driven down by the continuance of unfettered low skilled inward migration.
 

tavyred

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 23, 2004
Messages
14,159
Maybe now the lazy unemployed council house dwellers will be able to get a job in Starbucks. Just a shame they wont be able to afford to buy any fruit or veg in the supermarket.
Oh Anonymous.
Why do you hate your own countrymen so?
 

manc grecian

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
22,338
Location
following through
It is remarkable how many left leaning ‘commentators’ on here are prepared to see it from the business standpoint on immigration and see a situation where wages are driven down by the continuance of unfettered low skilled inward migration.
Does this mean the government is going to dramatically increase the living wage?
 

tavyred

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Aug 23, 2004
Messages
14,159
Does this mean the government is going to dramatically increase the living wage?
The hope is that a better trained, more productive and ultimately smaller workforce will encourage employers to pay more.
 

Anonymous

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Messages
6,019
Location
in yr internats
Oh Anonymous.
Why do you hate your own countrymen so?
Because they are lazy and expect to be treated like little princes. Not universally of course but put it this way, I havent pushed to promote many Brits within my company.
 

Anonymous

Well-known Exeweb poster
Joined
Oct 22, 2008
Messages
6,019
Location
in yr internats
The hope is that a better trained, more productive and ultimately smaller workforce will encourage employers to pay more.
I'm not paying more, just moving project bases abroad. Taking capital out of UK and putting it into Romania, Senegal and India as we speak. :)

Just to explain: I have a finite capital budget, why would I spend it on projects with a low rate of return and uncertain future. Better to spend it in places where I get more bang for my buck and high IRR.
 
Last edited:

Jason H

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
36,838
Location
Hounslow, Middlesex
Does this mean the government is going to dramatically increase the living wage?
Ours is, or at least was at last look, 2nd highest in Europe.
 

Grecian2K

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
32,985
Location
Busy knitting muesli
It is remarkable how many left leaning ‘commentators’ on here are prepared to see it from the business standpoint on immigration and see a situation where wages are driven down by the continuance of unfettered low skilled inward migration.
I do hope that you aren't including me in that sweeping generalisation there Tavy! :p

Hold on to your hat but believe it or not, to some extent I'm in accord with you on this! I certainly agree that business could and should take a bit more share of the economic pain - especially all those self-congratulatory fat-cat "captains of industry and commerce" who might consider giving each other inflation-busting personal pay rises year after year.

But the fact remains that the "race to the bottom" has been going on for many, many years. Even despite the introduction of the minimum wage many of the lowest paid are on zero hour, precarious contracts with no guarantee at all of a sure annual salary.

The worst offenders in this respect have tended to be the care, hospitality, agricultural and (to a certain extent) construction sector. Making the matters worse in many of these areas the work is either zero-hours and/or extremely seasonal making any chance of being able to guarantee the proposed ANNUAL earnings requirement.

The other offensive thing in Priti Vacant's cunning plan is the complete refusal to recognise any vocational qualifications as an alternative to a "PhD". Is some spotty faced oik with a degree in PPE or Media Studies really that much more valuable to society that those hard-working folk (regardless of nationality) who pick your daily vegetable or care for your elderly relatives in the care home for peanuts?
 

Grecian2K

Very well known Exeweb poster
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
32,985
Location
Busy knitting muesli
The hope is that a better trained, more productive and ultimately smaller workforce will encourage employers to pay more.
So using unemployment as the principal lever in a "prices & incomes" policy then?
How very 70s.
 
Top